Joint Commission 'Top Performers' List Adds 200 Hospitals
She adds that the hospitals were rated based on their performance on "national evidence-based process of care "accountability" measures that the hospitals chose to report."
In an interview, Sharon Springer, the organization's director of external measurement relations, adds that "it's heartening to the Joint Commission to see that hospitals continue to improve, and that we have more top performers. But one of the things we find really heartening is the fact that we had 244 hospitals that achieved 'Top Performer' status for two consecutive years. That really speaks to the fact that these organizations are able to sustain that performance, and that's key."
The hospitals were evaluated based on how they scored in 43 performance measures they chose to report within eight categories. This is twenty measures and four categories more than were considered last year.
The JC evaluated how hospitals provided care for patients with heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, or childhood asthma, or who needed psychiatric services, or underwent surgery. The Joint Commission also evaluated how well hospitals implemented measures designed to prevent stroke or venous thromboembolism from occurring.
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers