Businesses Not Interested in Absorbing Costs for Healthcare Reform
John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media, September 17, 2009
As for a pay-of-play mandate:
- 37% of employers say they would provide company-sponsored health coverage that substantially exceeds the standard.
- 29% of employers would discontinue company-sponsored health coverage and pay the assessment if the per-employee costs of payments to the federal government were substantially lower than their current costs.
- 26% would provide company-sponsored health coverage at the level of the minimum standard required.
"In some industries, particularly those with low margins and lower-income/high-turnover employee populations, some companies would, under a mandate, choose to write a check to the government and allow employees to purchase coverage in a reformed market for individual health insurance," noted Fontanetta. "For example, fully 42% of retail companies in the survey said they would close their plans and pay a federal assessment, versus 28% of those in financial services and 24% of those in technology/telecommunications."
John Commins is an editor with HealthLeaders Media. He can be reached at jcommins@healthleadersmedia.com.
1
|
2

Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- CMS Reveals Central Line Infection Rates, Finally
- 5010 Logjam Means No Pay for Physicians
- Keeping Readmission Rates Low with Treatment Guidelines
- Getting to the Heart of Cardiology Alignment
- Parkland Keeping Consultant's Analysis Under Wraps
- Payment Cuts to Critical Access Hospitals 'Inevitable'
- Medicare Physician Payment Rule Factors in GPCI
- Leading Change is Tough from the Back of a Limo
- Feds Release Final Rules on Health Plan Language
- Engineering a High-Performance Emergency Department

