Businesses Not Interested in Absorbing Costs for Healthcare Reform
John Commins, for HealthLeaders Media, September 17, 2009
As for a pay-of-play mandate:
- 37% of employers say they would provide company-sponsored health coverage that substantially exceeds the standard.
- 29% of employers would discontinue company-sponsored health coverage and pay the assessment if the per-employee costs of payments to the federal government were substantially lower than their current costs.
- 26% would provide company-sponsored health coverage at the level of the minimum standard required.
"In some industries, particularly those with low margins and lower-income/high-turnover employee populations, some companies would, under a mandate, choose to write a check to the government and allow employees to purchase coverage in a reformed market for individual health insurance," noted Fontanetta. "For example, fully 42% of retail companies in the survey said they would close their plans and pay a federal assessment, versus 28% of those in financial services and 24% of those in technology/telecommunications."
John Commins is an editor with HealthLeaders Media. He can be reached at jcommins@healthleadersmedia.com.
1
|
2

Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- 10 Major Changes to Health Reform in House's Reconciliation Bill
- Six Reasons Proposed Hospital Advertising Ban Will Never Pass
- Ten Ways to Increase Nurses' Time at the Bedside
- Match Day a Reminder of Primary Care's Struggles
- Hospitals Make Employee Flu Vaccinations a Patient Safety Issue
- Can 'Deadly Deliveries' Be a Wake-Up Call to Physicians, Hospitals?
- Physicians Generate $1.5M Annually for Their Hospitals, Says Survey
- Medical Breakthroughs That Will Change Healthcare
- Hospital Monitors Infectious Diseases Using Real-Time Surveillance
- Massachusetts Investigating Wide Disparities in Hospital, Provider Reimbursements
