Jury Finds Against 16 Labor Bosses in Health Worker Case
Defense attorney Siegel, however, heatedly disputes the charges, saying the case is not over yet and that the plaintiffs' claims are exaggerated. In fact, he says, many of their original accusations were dropped or thrown out by the judge.
"We're disappointed that the jury awarded anything against us," Siegel says. "We feel like we've made a lot of progress in whittling down what was originally, the week before trial, a $25 million claim, down to $727,850."
Siegel maintains that the jury did not order his clients to pay $1.5 million, but that the judgment was either against the newly formed labor union, NUHW, or against the 16 remaining defendants. For example, Siegel says, the judgment against Rosselli was only $70,600; the decision against John Vellardita was $77,850.
"The judgment we believe is 'joint and several,' in that it is either against the defendants individually or against the NUHW. They are not both [the union and the individuals] responsible for the same amount. They [UHW] can't collect it twice."
Additionally, Siegel says, the bulk of the judgment is only "for the portion of UHW's operating costs that allegedly went toward helping members oppose SEIU's order and organize to resist a trusteeship."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised
- Business Roundup: M&A Activity Down Slightly in First Half of 2014
- CFO Exchange: Healthcare Leaders Share 5 Innovative Ideas
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- Large Employers Trimming Healthcare Spending