18 Medical Necessity Issues OK'd for RAC Review
James Carroll, for HealthLeaders Media, August 16, 2010
"In looking at percutaneous cardiovascular procedures, it says that medical necessity is excluded except for DRG 249. This came as a bit of a surprise because during the last year, the MACs have been heavily auditing DRG 247, which is a drug eluting stent, instead of 249, which is non-drug eluting, and a less common target of contractor attention," says Taylor. "It will be interesting to see if the RACs and MACs maintain this slightly different focus; if their areas of review are being purposefully kept apart; or if this is just a temporary situation before the rest of these stents become an approved medical necessity issue for the RACs."
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Hospitals Profit On Bloodstream Infections
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- Hospital Pricing Transparency a Marketing Game Changer
- Less Blood Testing for Some Surgeries Safe, Cost Effective
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.