Healthcare Consolidation Lessons and a Prediction
These 'hospitalist' companies, which manage a certain cadre of physicians for the hospital with which they have a contract of typically between three and five years—were mere startups a few years ago. Now they're big companies. And they're branching out into emergency and intensive care medicine. How long before they're employing teams of cardiologists on a scale unimagined in the past?
Never before have hospitals outsourced the management of such a key cohort to their success. What reason is there for a redundancy of administrative staff at such hospitals when that company can as easily manage their physicians as a large, multi-hospital system? There's money to be saved—and made.
I realize that my argument can cut both ways. Efficient outsourcing can also plausibly save the independence of the local community hospital and help it compete with its larger, more efficient peers. It's just that I think it's more likely to happen the other way around.
Philip Betbeze is senior leadership editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Advocate, NorthShore Deal Would Create 16-Hospital System
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- 3 Strategies for Retaining Millennial Employees
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform
- Power of price: In South FL and the nation, healthcare costs often are shrouded in secrecy
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances