Healthcare Consolidation Lessons and a Prediction
These 'hospitalist' companies, which manage a certain cadre of physicians for the hospital with which they have a contract of typically between three and five years—were mere startups a few years ago. Now they're big companies. And they're branching out into emergency and intensive care medicine. How long before they're employing teams of cardiologists on a scale unimagined in the past?
Never before have hospitals outsourced the management of such a key cohort to their success. What reason is there for a redundancy of administrative staff at such hospitals when that company can as easily manage their physicians as a large, multi-hospital system? There's money to be saved—and made.
I realize that my argument can cut both ways. Efficient outsourcing can also plausibly save the independence of the local community hospital and help it compete with its larger, more efficient peers. It's just that I think it's more likely to happen the other way around.
Philip Betbeze is senior leadership editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- Hospital M&A Volume Up, Value Down in 3Q
- 50 Years of Fighting Pressure Ulcers Called Into Question
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Why You Should Involve Patients in Nursing Handoffs
- Nonprofit Hospital Outlook 'Negative' in 2014
- The 5 Biggest Healthcare Finance Trouble Spots