AMGA Raises Red Flag on 'Burdensome' ACO Rules
In an interview Thursday with HealthLeaders Media, Fisher said AMGA would provide a detailed critique of the proposed rules and a list of recommendations before the end of the public comment period on June 6. "We just sent this letter because we wanted to make sure that CMS was aware of the significant changes that need to be made, and let them know how serious these problems are. We didn't want to wait until the process had already started," he said.
Fisher detailed a list of concerns that AMGA would address in its formal comments.
Risk Adjustment: "We're concerned that CMS intends on adjusting the risks on ACOs costs calculations only for the first year, and these are three year agreements. Most of my members are very worried that they are going to get adversely selected against by frail and ill patients because the word will get out that these are high quality low cost organizations that do a terrific job taking care of patients. If you don't adjust after the first year and get an influx of patients that are much more severely ill than the first estimates gives, you are going to be risk adjusted incorrectly."
ACO Patient Attribution: "The attribution model that CMS is proposing is retrospective. They are going to do a look-back over three years to count the plurality of primary care visits to a facility. Whoever has the most gets that patient. They aren't going to have that until after the first year. So you are going to have to gear up to be an ACO, you are going to have to make an investment in the infrastructure, and you are not going to know who your patients are until after that first year. And, given that there is a 5,000 Medicare beneficiary minimum by statute, you might do all of these investments and find out you don't hit the 5,000 Medicare beneficiary threshold and you are out of the program. We would like to see them do a prospective patient attribution. Let's have these ACOs know who their patients are when they begin so they can make sure those patients are getting the care they need to improve quality and lower costs."
- Federal Appeals Court Mulls Observation Status
- How the Military's EHR Reboot Will Impact Interoperability
- How One Health System Saved $3.5M in Benefits Costs
- HCA to Acquire CareNow Urgent Care Centers
- BCBS Tries New Drug Contracting Model
- 'Leadership Gap' Threatens MU Momentum, Says AMA
- Abington Health, Jefferson Health Plan '100% Equal' Merger
- Dental Board Case Before SCOTUS Has Far-Reaching Implications
- Ballot Initiative Pits Providers Against Payers in SD
- The Case for Recycling Surgical Supplies