BCBS Restricts Competition, Suit Charges
Not too surprisingly, both the trade group and the Alabama Blues are dismissing the merits of the suit. "Our company operates in compliance with a license from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association," said Koko Mackin, vice president of corporate communications for the Alabama Blues. "We comply with all state and federal laws. The allegations have no merit."
Kelly Miller, a spokesperson for the trade group says the suit has "no merit and we will vigorously defend the Blue Cross Blue Shield model."
The suit seeks damages equal to three times the unspecified amount of damages suffered by the plaintiffs. It also asks the court to stop the defendants from entering into or enforcing any agreements that restrict the territories or geographic regions where a Blue Cross Blue Shield Association member "may plan to compete."
The suit was filed in U.S District Court, Northern District of Alabama by Whatley Kallas, LLC, which has offices in several cities across the country, including New York and Birmingham. Its website describes the firm as a "healthcare boutique" whose lawyers have focused their practices on "litigating against, and negotiating with, health insurers across the country on a wide range of issues."
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives
- AMA Pushes Lame Duck Congress for SGR Repeal
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Medicare to Finally Pay Doctors for Care They Were Giving Away
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- Quality in Ambulatory Surgical Settings Gets a Closer Look
- How Payers Are Curbing Behavioral-Health Cost Drivers
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative