Why Financial Success Eludes Majority of Healthcare Mergers
Essentially, it means the healthcare industry overall is reactive right now, when it really needs to purposeful and strategic, says Booz partner Sanjay Saxena, who has advised on many mergers both inside and outside the healthcare industry.
"You see someone for sale, and suddenly there's a frenzy of activity concerning whether to go after them," he says. "If you look outside the healthcare industry, companies are very purposeful, and have acquisition playbooks with lists of other companies they want to buy."
This all sounds obvious, he says, but healthcare doesn't have this type of metrics-driven future game planning. In part that's because historically, the industry has not had to compete on value the way others have.
But it's not as if healthcare mergers are short on metrics. After all, these are transactions that are debated and deliberated all the way from the local newspaper to the board level, to the community, and even to the legislative level.
Detailed financial documents are shared among the parties before acquisitions are final. So how do so many fail to achieve the synergies many of the new partners love to boast of when an acquisition is announced?
- Ratcheting Up Patient Experience Has a Downside
- 12 Hires to Keep Your Hospital Out of Trouble
- Meaningful Use Payment Adjustments Begin
- 'Mega Boards' Could be Rural Healthcare Disruptor
- HL20: Lee Aase—Who's Behind @MayoClinic
- Taming Time and Moving Healthcare Data
- 1 in 5 Eligible Hospitals Penalized for HACs
- HL20: Anne Wojcicki—Unlocking Consumer Access to Genetics
- Narrow Networks Enjoying a Resurgence
- Top 3 Nursing Lessons of 2014