Despite Merger Activity, Negative Credit Conditions Persist
Overall, then, business still stinks?
"The drivers are some of the revenue pressures that hospitals are under," Martin says. "Revenue is tightening. Many are looking for ways to reduce costs to offset that and move from fee-for-service to more value-based reimbursement. They're improving costs and increasing quality and in order to do that, you need scale."
Yes, we know all that.
At what point will the math start to work again?
Martin won't say. She just knows that the environment is so challenging for the foreseeable future that some hospitals—even some systems—will be paying higher premiums on their debt because of the perceived risk of the business. It boils down to how successful these mergers are on the whole, and nobody has a good read on that, she says.
"To the extent that these M&As reduce costs, that can be a positive," says Martin. "The potential downside is that after the initial consummation, the hospitals and health systems become distracted by integration and are unable to achieve those benefits. There are also issues with volumes and physician loyalty."
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Payment Reform Naysayers 'Better Wake Up'
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- HIT Leaders Want Flexibility, Transparency from Next HHS Chief
- As Hospitalist Patient Loads Rise, So Do Hospital Costs
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'
- Advance Directives: Let's Make a Law