Magazine
Blogs
Industry Surveys
Breakthroughs Reports
Events
Sponsored
Departments Add News Widget

Defensive Medicine?

Les Masterson, for HealthLeaders Magazine, August 12, 2008
Are you a health leader?
Qualify for a free subscription to HealthLeaders magazine.

Foster says the CMS list offered last year met with the legislation's intent—never events that hospitals could prevent by using proper science. The new proposed list, however, includes items that hospitals have not learned to control, she says. For instance, there simply isn't the evidence-based knowledge to help hospitals prevent conditions like Legionnaire's disease, says Foster.

Wachter foresees a time when hospitals might perform extra tests for each admitted patient to make sure they don't lose out on reimbursement later. He says these situations could squander resources and cause harm to patients. "This really does change the pressure that comes down on frontline providers from on high to look good on these things," he says.

Quality focus
Not all providers share Wachter's concern about the impact of CMS' latest list of never events, however. Officials at the 159-staffed-bed Delnor Hospital in Geneva, IL, don't expect the changes will significantly affect the facility; the added emphasis on quality will merely sharpen the hospital's focus on documenting conditions and protecting patients, says Marie Lee, director of quality improvement.

John Hubbe, vice president of medical and legal affairs who oversees quality at the hospital, says one area in which Delnor will feel some effects is staffing. The hospital expects a larger workload to properly document present-on-admission conditions and has hired two people whose duties include helping with concurrent coding to handle the present-on-admission tracking. In addition, the hospital has also increased communication with physicians and the medical staff to make them aware of the CMS changes.

1 | 2 | 3
1 comments on "Defensive Medicine?"


jelam4822 (8/15/2008 at 9:39 AM)
I agree with Dr. Wachter. CMS focus appears to have shifted to saving dollars as opposed to maintaining patient safety. "Never events" meaning seems to be changing from 'never happening' to 'never having to pay for it/them'. A much more incentivising approach would be to pay a lower rate than not paying at all. Also, can you spell "cherry-picking" or "profiling"? Seems like such methods could easily become factors in making treatment and/or admission decisions. CMS would do well to give more thought to its decision in this case. Like death and taxes, some things are simply not avoidable in all situations.