Few States Choose to Operate Health Insurance Exchanges
The 18 states that have opted to build their own exchanges are California, Hawaii, Idaho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Utah, Kentucky, Colorado, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, Oregon and Washington.
Other states are opting out, with governors from many of those states citing the ongoing expense of operating and maintaining the exchanges as a key reason. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said her state would be saddled with up to $40 million in annual expenses to operate an exchange after federal subsidies expire in 2015.
Delaware is one of only seven states to have committed to a federal partnership as of late January. The head of the state agency overseeing that partnership spoke with HealthLeaders Media about the benefits and challenges of the new insurance model.
After the February 15 deadline, the federal government will set up exchanges for the states. While it's not clear how the federal option will work, it seems likely they'll operate through a single portal where consumers can log on, choose their state, and browse through a list of insurers and health plans available in their area.
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- 3 Ways to Rev Employee Development Programs
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Transforming Decision Support and Reporting
- Aligning Executive Compensation with Provider Mission
- Nurse Ethics Comes to a Head at Guantanamo Bay
- In Lakeport, CA, a Population Health Laboratory is Born
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health