CA Nurse Staffing Law Generates More Debate
The law effectively increased RN staffing in California hospitals, the study found, which supports proponents of staffing ratio laws. Those arguments, however, fail to address the number of travelers and temporary staff that hospitals must hire to meet requirements and that is expensive and inconvenient.
The staffing ratio debate will heat up as hospitals feel the first effects of payments for quality and patient experience. To head off legislation, hospitals must demonstrate that existing staffing plans provide safe patient care. Top performing hospitals often staff better than the laws require, but they do so with the freedom to adjust as necessary, depending on patient need and the organization's resources.
Patient acuity systems can be invaluable for maximizing staffing and saving money. So can offering nurses scheduling options beyond the 12-hour shift, such as peak-time shifts, multi-task shifts, group sharing, or job sharing.
To provide a reasonable argument against legislating ratios, hospitals must demonstrate optimal nurse staffing and a commitment to high-quality patient care. Involving RNs in the staffing decisions is the best way to head off union action.
Rebecca Hendren is a senior managing editor at HCPro, Inc. in Danvers, MA. She edits www.StrategiesForNurseManagers.com and manages The Leaders' Lounge blog for nurse managers. Email her at email@example.com.
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives
- AMA Pushes Lame Duck Congress for SGR Repeal
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Medicare to Finally Pay Doctors for Care They Were Giving Away
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- Quality in Ambulatory Surgical Settings Gets a Closer Look
- How Payers Are Curbing Behavioral-Health Cost Drivers
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative