Nursing
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Nurse Staffing Costs Must Be Weighed Against Cost of Errors

Rebecca Hendren, for HealthLeaders Media, August 30, 2011

"Some of these things people might call 'soft costs,' like nurse turnover," says Douglas. "But to me, money is money."

Soft costs have hard financial implications. Value-based purchasing has already put real money behind patient satisfaction. To make the link to staffing research and why it matters, we have to stop looking at staffing numbers in isolation. Until we look at the whole picture, which includes everything associated with staffing, we're not going to understand financial performance.

"Staffing costs sit in one part of the budget, so we think of the results there," says Douglas. "Then the cost of errors sits in another part of the budget. If I could say one thing to healthcare executives it is to make staffing a top strategic priority in your organization. If you look at top priorities—LOS, safety, quality—all of these things have direct links to staffing."

An organization that has cut back on staffing may not notice that it is overusing overtime and not notice that there's a relationship between the overtime and the number of infections on a unit.

Peter I. Buerhaus, PhD, RN, FAAN, chair of the National Health Care Workforce Commission, a 15-member panel composed of distinguished leaders from academia and the healthcare industry created under The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, published research in 2008 looking at unreimbursed errors in healthcare, such as catheter-associated urinary tract infections and central line infections.

"I decided to get out my calculator and add them up. When I looked at it in one year the total came to $21 billion in unreimbursable events," says Douglas.

1 | 2 | 3

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

14 comments on "Nurse Staffing Costs Must Be Weighed Against Cost of Errors"


Mark (9/16/2011 at 4:59 PM)
"To do so, we need a better understanding of what the research shows about nurse staffing." The research continues to show that under staffing leads to errors, increases in infection rates and marginal care. What "better" understanding is it that we need? The need to "flex up" will only work in the unpredictable world of hospital nursing when the flex nurse is available immediately. Too often there's no one at all to do the flexing and the nurses are left runnig around like headless chikens, praying that no pt. will be harmed by shift's end.

Mike (9/14/2011 at 9:36 PM)
Bonnie, there was no mention of the staff being under educated. I believe the issue at hand was the lack of sufficient staffing, which, in turn, causes the remaining staff to be overbudened. Thus the errors and burnout.

Bonnie (9/7/2011 at 5:22 PM)
I agree that nurse staffing does effect issues such as infections, falls, med errors, etc. However far more than that, continued education and updating nurses on best practise does work. Include nurses in the quality one on one education of their peers has proven to be far more effective than online training. Involving the new grads in a concentrated quality education is very effective in preventing safety issues.