Dartmouth Atlas: Poor Care for Terminal Cancer Patients Widespread
"It's surprising, and a bit frustrating, and I think most importantly, sad for the patients, because they can not go to some public data repository and know what kind of care they're going to get at a particular hospital or a type of hospital," Morden says. "There's very little pattern to it, and we found that it was a hard to sort out."
Morden explains that researchers anticipated that NCI-designated cancer centers in general "would do a better job, would be more in line with quality, [and] they would be more in tune with patient preferences. But we didn't find that."
The facilities were divided into four types:
- 21 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) hospitals,
- 22 non-NCCN NCI centers
- 161 academic medical centers
- 4,240 community hospitals
They were also grouped by size: fewer than 150 beds, 150-300 beds, and greater than 300 beds; and by for-profit versus not-for-profit status.
There were some differences in the level of aggressive care between the hospital types, although the range within each type was wide.
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- How Simple Data Analytics is Driving Physician Incentives
- AMA Pushes Lame Duck Congress for SGR Repeal
- In PCMH, the 'P' is Not for 'Physician'