Reform Bills Still Reward Quantity over Quality
Yet for all the talk about the end of fee-for-service, we are waiting to see an alternative. The two bills introduced so far keep the current reimbursement system for the most part, and the public option would be based on the same Medicare payment model, only paid at a higher rate.
The Senate Finance Committee has yet to release a bill, so I may be judging the sausage before it has been made. Or perhaps the reimbursement overhaul is intended to come from the Independent Medicare Advisory Council I wrote about last week.
But where are the bundled payments that piqued the industry's interest earlier this year? Where is the reimbursement system that the Mayo Clinic asked for last week that rewards quality and evidence-based care? Where is the real change?
Note: You can sign up to receive HealthLeaders Media PhysicianLeaders, a free weekly e-newsletter that features the top physician business headlines of the week from leading news sources.
Elyas Bakhtiari is a freelance editor for HealthLeaders Media.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement