Pay-for-performance Results Lower When Productivity is the Focus
However, the researchers found that the greatest improvements were found among those groups that placed less emphasis on physician productivity—and greater emphasis on clinical quality and patient experience. When financial incentives were paid directly to physicians—rather than being used more broadly- they found that putting too much emphasis on physician productivity actually had a negative impact on the experiences patients had when visiting their primary care provider.
Keeping in mind the current healthcare debate on Capitol Hill, Rodriguez said that quality improvement and reimbursement reform efforts "should integrate patient reported experiences of care as a central metric for evaluating reform effects."
Janice Simmons is a senior editor and Washington, DC, correspondent for HealthLeaders Media Online. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files