Pay-for-performance Results Lower When Productivity is the Focus
However, the researchers found that the greatest improvements were found among those groups that placed less emphasis on physician productivity—and greater emphasis on clinical quality and patient experience. When financial incentives were paid directly to physicians—rather than being used more broadly- they found that putting too much emphasis on physician productivity actually had a negative impact on the experiences patients had when visiting their primary care provider.
Keeping in mind the current healthcare debate on Capitol Hill, Rodriguez said that quality improvement and reimbursement reform efforts "should integrate patient reported experiences of care as a central metric for evaluating reform effects."
Janice Simmons is a senior editor and Washington, DC, correspondent for HealthLeaders Media Online. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- HCA to Acquire CareNow Urgent Care Centers
- Dental Board Case Before SCOTUS Has Far-Reaching Implications
- BCBS Tries New Drug Contracting Model
- Abington Health, Jefferson Health Plan '100% Equal' Merger
- 76% of Physicians Don't Like CMS Quality Reporting Programs
- The Case for Recycling Surgical Supplies
- Federal Appeals Court Mulls Observation Status
- How the Military's EHR Reboot Will Impact Interoperability
- Ballot Initiative Pits Providers Against Payers in SD
- How One Health System Saved $3.5M in Benefits Costs