In Meaningful Use Reports, Quality Matters
The quality provisions within meaningful use data gathering may be complex, but that is to be expected, Metzger says. "Given the orientation of the program as an investment in improving health care, the inclusion of quality reporting in meaningful use is not surprising," they write. "In a health system or medial group, a careful analysis of quality reporting must precede final decisions about how to approach Stage 1 meaningful use for EPs (eligible professionals)."
Metzger says that while she is not predicting how physician practices may be impacted by the meaningful use quality requirements, she notes there is enough complexity in the requirements that should make physicians be concerned and take notice.
In December, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released documents shedding light on what physicians and hospitals must do to qualify for EHR incentive payments under the HIECH Act. To quality for incentives, physicians and hospitals must be using "certified EHR technology" in a "meaningful manner." Enrolment for the meaningful use incentives began January 3, 2011.
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- AHIP: Enormity of HIX Challenges Sinks In
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers