Physicians
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Spine Surgeons Waste Millions On Opened, Unused Implant Devices

Joe Cantlupe, for HealthLeaders Media, November 10, 2011

Too often, McGuire says, there is "intra-operative waste," which he and his colleagues describe as any item "wasted when it was prepared or opened during a case, but was ultimately not used or implanted and could not be subsequently used or implanted in a different patient."

What's the main driver of the cost burden? In the parlance of McGuire's study, it is simply stated as "surgeon changed mind."

In the Beth Israel Deaconess study, items improperly wasted included surgical implant devices, bone graft devices, and miscellaneous other material such as drapes, gowns, globes, sponges, sutures, and drains. A surgeon's change of mind accounted for 44% of the wasted items, and "contamination" for 27% of disposals. Other reasons for waste were "equipment failure/technical difficulties," items "opened by mistake," and "case cancellation."

"When we say 'waste,' it was something paid for, charged to the hospital, and it wasn't utilized in another patient. It was basically removed or thrown into the trash. That's waste," McGuire says. "In our environment, any of that wasted instrument is paid for by the hospital but not charged to the insurance company because it's all under the DRG [diagnosis-related group] payment system. That's why the word 'waste' is utilized."

Some level of waste is normal, "especially at level-one academic centers, since you are doing multilevel complex cases," McGuire says. "There is a significant number of older patients who have osteoporosis; you put a screw in and you engage it and tighten it down, it doesn't fit, wrong size, and so there will be an incidence of waste."

Because there are so many variations of waste, physicians weren't exactly sure how to define it properly when they began their study, McGuire says. "We realized that there was no clear definition of what constituted a wasted implant," he wrote in a blog. To get to the root of the problem, they asked surgeons, operating room personnel, industry representatives, and nurses to help them pinpoint areas of waste that should be eliminated from operating rooms.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Spine Surgeons Waste Millions On Opened, Unused Implant Devices"


Apurv Gupta (11/10/2011 at 5:07 PM)
Really enjoyed reading this article, which reveals a highly successful deployment of a "performance improvement project". A similar "performance improvement" approach can work in improving quality, mitigating risk, and improving patient safety. Just to make the elements clear to all leaders, I'm posting my blog on this topic below. The article identifies the following "performance improvement tactics" that should be integral components of all improvement projects: ** Examined how much they used and spent (review and monitor data) ** Questioned why each device was being being used (ask why five times) ** Studied reasons for wastage (undertake root cause analysis) ** Asked surgeons, operating room personnel, industry representatives, and nurses to help them identify waste (seek multi-disciplinary input) ** Compiled lists of who had been wasting more instruments than others (create profiles) ** Shared lists [of waste generators] with each other (create report cards) ** Awareness campaign (educate) ** Physician leadership prompted change (get support from leadership) The key behavioral drivers that project leader, Dr. Kevin McGuire, Chief of Orthopedic Surgery, identified are "physicians are competitive in nature" and "no one wants to be an outlier". Understanding these drivers is key to understanding some of the performance improvement tools and how to deploy them effectively.