Dartmouth Atlas: Poor Care for Terminal Cancer Patients Widespread
"It's surprising, and a bit frustrating, and I think most importantly, sad for the patients, because they can not go to some public data repository and know what kind of care they're going to get at a particular hospital or a type of hospital," Morden says. "There's very little pattern to it, and we found that it was a hard to sort out."
Morden explains that researchers anticipated that NCI-designated cancer centers in general "would do a better job, would be more in line with quality, [and] they would be more in tune with patient preferences. But we didn't find that."
The facilities were divided into four types:
- 21 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) hospitals,
- 22 non-NCCN NCI centers
- 161 academic medical centers
- 4,240 community hospitals
They were also grouped by size: fewer than 150 beds, 150-300 beds, and greater than 300 beds; and by for-profit versus not-for-profit status.
There were some differences in the level of aggressive care between the hospital types, although the range within each type was wide.
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Targeting Self-Insured Populations
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- 4 Crucial Tactics for Reining in Healthcare Cost
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- Docs Fret as HHS Addresses Malpractice Reporting 'Loopholes'