Blood Transfusion Refusal Poses No Risk in Cardiac Patients
The study suggests that blood transfusions in and of themselves carry under-recognized risks that offset risks from refusing blood transfusions, says Pattakos, who now is a general surgery resident at Georgetown University Hospital in Washington, D.C.
He cautions that the results should not be overinterpreted, because the topic requires much more research for validation.
He emphasizes, however, that surgeons should give the idea of transfusion a lot more thought for each patient, rather than acting with "a knee-jerk reaction when a particular (hemoglobin or hematocrit) level is reached."
For Jehovah's Witness patients undergoing cardiac surgery, common strategies include initiating doses of the drug erythropoietin and iron and B-complex vitamins, hemoconcentation and minimal crystalloid use, intraoperative use of antifibrinolytics and cell saver and smaller cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, and postoperative liberal use of additional operations for bleeding, the researchers wrote.
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Esther Dyson Launches Population Health Challenge
- Crisis Spurs Healthcare Payment Reform in Arkansas
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- ICD-10 Delay Alters Provider, Vendor Prep
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Reduce Readmissions by Activating Patients to Do 'Self-Care'