Preventing Amputations Starts with PCPs
I found this bit of information troubling. Why would physicians not refer to him, or other specialists, if there were a chance that an amputation could be prevented? Most patients at risk of losing limbs are afflicted with peripheral arterial disease, a circulatory problem in which narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs.
2 Barriers to Referrals
"Typically, there are two reasons a physician would not refer to an amputation prevention specialist," Mustapha says. "Lack of knowledge on the part of the referring physician about the currently available limb salvage techniques is the primary reason. The second reason is when physicians know these techniques do exist, but choose not to refer the patients for the limb salvage procedures as some would view this as a defeat on their part."
"Hence," he adds, "our push to patients and their families to be the primary advocates for saving their limbs, and their lives."
Mustapha's specialty is performing artery and vein catheterizations designed to open vessels and improve circulation. The treatment he developed at Metro uses an ultrasound-guided interventional device through the foot and an ultrasound transducer that helps identify blood flow that traditional angiography misses.
When the endovascular intervention program began five years ago, the Metro Health System saved at least 88% to 92% of limbs that had been recommended for amputation, often by the patients' primary care physicians. It now saves even more—96% to 98%, says Mustapha.
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- CMS Offers Some ACOs $114M for 'Upfront' Costs
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- Ebola: Second TX Nurse Diagnosed After Improper Protective Gear Application
- Providers Ask HHS to Address EHR Interoperability Barriers
- 5 Digital Marketing Efforts Every Hospital Should Try
- Ebola: A Call for Designated Hospitals
- 16 Medicare Advantage Plans Earn 5-Star Ratings
- The Drug Price Reform Debate