Physicians
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Physicians Rail at Recertification Requirements

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media, June 19, 2014

Doctors are additionally concerned about new transparency policies that reveal to the public which doctors meet interval requirements, and which ones don't. "There's an insinuation that good doctors pass their boards, and bad doctors don't," Fleming says.

'Huge Stakes'

General guidelines for the new certification are now required by the American Board of Medical Specialties for all 24 boards, each of which tailors specific certification requirements for its group of specialty practitioners.

For internists, the largest group, board certification comes from the American Board of Internal Medicine, which certifies 200,000 internists or one in four physicians in the United States.

But it is the way the ABIM has interpreted its mandate from the ABMS, and tailored its own rules, that has internists fired up. "The ABIM's requirements are as rigorous or more rigorous than many other certification boards," Fleming says.

For example, the new rules require doctors to survey patients' charts, to assure that certain services have been provided, such as foot exams for all patients with diabetes. The effort may involve hiring more staff.

"We're not saying they shouldn't have to do this, but the problem is the way it's being rolled out, with very tight expectations that are burdensome for many practices. We don't think it should be part of the recertification process," Fleming says.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

9 comments on "Physicians Rail at Recertification Requirements"


Daniel Ramirez (9/16/2014 at 5:10 PM)
Connie, I hope you can forgive my impertinence, but it does not surprise me that you are a... nurse coordinator? ... What board do you sit on? Are you really down here in the mud with the rest of us taking care of PATIENTS on a daily basis? Or do you come down from your desk job perch from time to time to dictate to others?

Daniel Ramirez (9/16/2014 at 5:06 PM)
As a physician I try hard to do the right thing by my patients - ALWAYS. I take pride in my work, and am willing to abide by the rules. But I know a rat when I smell one. You mean to tell me that after ALL of my years of schooling, training, test taking... my board-certification, reimbursement, good standing in my profession, and perhaps even my LICENSE is being held hostage by non-practicing bureaucrat physicians? Unless I play by their silly rules that have ZERO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE to making me a better doctor???? Sirs and Madams in your ivory towers: you can all go straight to hell. This is a SCAM.

Paul Kempen, MD, PhD (7/7/2014 at 12:36 PM)
Ms Clark has actively supported the positions of the ABIM, which is a private corporation recently having invented MOC for their own corporate profits, certification already costing currently $400 million a year in gross receipts and paying their CEO salaries as high as $1.2 million in 2009. They have not been able to demonstrate Certification improves care, yet alone that MOC impacts care in outcome based study. They have even authored and published in 2002 an attempt at meta-analysis to prove Certification matters-but found this was impossible due to the poor quality of all prior studies, describing the "proof" as a "missing link" in the title (Sharp LK, Bashook PG, Lipsky MS, Horowitz SD, Miller SH. Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: the missing link. Acad Med 2002;77:534–42). The assumption that doctors are not "up to date" is further unfounded, as life long learning is essential to continue in practice and obtain state licenses. The fact that numerous state and national oversight mechanisms exist is ignored, as Ms Clark choses to support the ABMS to be her particular brand of reassurance-as unfounded as that is. I pointed repeatedly to ABMS written articles confirming there is a lack of evidence to support certification and their MOC program, while studying and publishing comprehensive reports to the contrary (Kempen PM. Maintenance of certification and licensure: regulatory capture of medicine. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1378-86. ) as have others. As for practice improvement modules: These include changing patient care without patients being informed of any risks, costs or dangers-while the sole purpose is for a doctor to personally profit=MOC re-certification. Research for personal benefit and without informed consent was internationally outlawed after WWII by the Nuremberg laws and subsequently validated among all civilized societies by the Helsinki declarations. Society DEMANDS that informed consent be required and that safety and review be assured for every patient in any experiemental setting. Validation of physician competence IS already being verified by multiple agencies including hospital and state medical boards who DO have practice authority, which the ABMS does not have. We do not provide free license to anyone to experiment with human life. This is exactly what the ABMS is forcing, while actually doing nothing to insure physician quality. Next time you go to your doctor ask him if he is MOC compliant and including you in his personal profiting MOC experiment. Be sure to ask what YOUR risks and costs will be to assure the ABMS that he is practicing medicine in YOUR and not the ABMS's best interest!