PCORI Nails Down a Definition, at Last
A Hard-to-Come-By Definition
Getting to a definition wasn't easy. It had to encompass "comparative effectiveness research," the typical scientific research projects that evaluate and compare the worth and quality of various treatments that providers now administer to patients.
But it also had to capture separate concepts that include the process of patient-healthcare system interaction: how patients and providers communicate, studies of barriers, such as transportation or language, to optimal care, how patients can get the best information about options, as well as what patients should do to improve those outcomes themselves.
A few members of PCORI's governors don't like the finished product and quibbled for 30 minutes before voting. Two of the 20 members who attended voted against and one abstained. There was passion, or maybe it was angst, in the room.
Convoluted? Skewed Toward Research?
Board of Governors member Francis Collins, MD, head of the National Institutes of Health, questioned whether the new definition is "skewed" to emphasize research in how patients and their caregivers communicate instead of research in what kind of care and treatments produce the best patient outcomes.
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- CA Powers Up $80M HIE to 'Create Value in the Data'