Quality e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Leapfrog Issues Hospital Safety Report Cards

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media, June 6, 2012

"People deserve to know that some hospitals are safer than others," she says.

The American Hospital Association is not happy with the new scorecard. In a terse one-sentence statement, Nancy Foster, the AHA's Vice President of Quality and Patient Safety Policy said: "The American Hospital Association has supported several good quality measures but many of the measures Leapfrog uses to grade hospitals are flawed and they do not accurately portray a picture of the safety efforts made by hospitals."

Ashish Jha, MD, of the Harvard School of Public Health Department of Health Policy and Management, and one of nine members on Leapfrog's advisory panel that determined which components would be used, explained the rating system.

"This is a patient safety score. It's not the same as whether you'll have a good experience in the hospital, and not even whether you'll get high quality care, such as the right tests or the right medications. This is about whether you will be harmed if you go to this hospital, and that's a very specific thing," Jha says.

The Leapfrog score is very different than the quality scores now available on Medicare's Hospital Compare, in which one or two percent of hospitals score "better than" or "worse than" in a category, like rates of 30-day readmissions or 30-day mortality, and 96% to 98% are all "average."

On the contrary, Binder says. Large numbers of hospitals are in each of the A, B and C grades.

She says that there were a considerable number of "surprises" in how the hospitals scored.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Leapfrog Issues Hospital Safety Report Cards"


Robert Finney PhD (6/6/2012 at 12:17 PM)
Patient Safety for Dummies Doctors "gamble" with patients' lives, but don't let the patient in on the bet. All the emphasis on communication apparently excludes the patient from the requirement of informed consent in making all medical decisions, which is a legal requirement. HMOs and medical groups are obsessed with protecting doctors from the consequences of medical errors. Kaiser Permanente really does gamble with patients' lives, including rewarding schedulers for not giving patients appointments, drive-thru deliveries, lying to kidney transplant patients, allowing social workers to prescribe drugs without psychiatrists' permission, failure to report sexual molestation of women patients... and most recently leaving a towel inside a patient. In the Permanente Journal (Kaiser's own publication), a Kaiser patient safety doctor admits that the health plan is the third party in the exam room, controlling the doctor-patient relationship, including the relationship between patient safety and cost to the health plan. Original investigations posted on www.hmohardball.com Robert Finney PhD