Financial Incentives for Preventing HAIs Don't Add Up to Much
The result was a paper published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicinein which the cost of five types of hospital infections tallied up to a scary $9.8 billion a year. A third of that figure is attributed to surgical site infections alone.
The actual total cost is much greater, because the project only counted infections in hospitals paid under Medicare's inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). Researchers excluded pediatric acute care and many other settings.
Absent this HAI cost awakening, federal rules now include four penalties or disincentives for higher HAI rates, but they are so meaningless in terms of their dollar amounts, that I'm calling them Chump Change, Mickey Mouse, Chicken Feed, and Peanuts.
1. Chump Change
Under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Medicare is prohibited from reimbursing hospitals additional costs to deal with extra care required for a patient who develops any of 10 hospital-acquired conditions, three of which are infections not present on admission. These are:
- Catheter associated urinary tract infections
- Vascular-associated infections and
- Surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft, orthopedic, bariatric, and cardiac implantable electronic device procedures.
But because hospitals are allowed to upwardly adjust the billing code for patients who are seriously ill, the dollars lost are ridiculously small.
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- CNO on Hospital Redesign: 'You Can't Over-Communicate'
- Carondelet to Pay $35M to Settle Fraud Allegations
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CA Powers Up $80M HIE to 'Create Value in the Data'
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal