What's Wrong With Healthcare Quality Measures? Part I
Here's Part 1 of my list.
1. There are too many rating systems.
There are too many types, methods, and brands of measurement systems. They're confusing the public and the providers who get scored. Some rating systems have evolved to a masterful marketing strategy that hospitals pay dearly for, and fail to explain to patients what it all means. Exactly what gets measured is often complicated and/or opaque:
- Truven Health Analytics' Top 100 Hospitals
- The Joint Commission's Top Performers
- U.S. News & World Report'sBest Hospitals
- Leapfrog Group's Safety Score
- Leapfrog Group's Survey
- Healthgrades' America's Best Hospitals
- Consumer Reports' Hospital Safety Ratings
- Hospital Compare
I have my favorites, but then I know what I'm looking for based on my likelihood of needing acute care. Hey, you know what, I changed my mind: The more the merrier. But these rating systems should make it much more clear what it is that they are measuring.
2. Ratings are often inaccurate.
Administrative data based on diagnostic codes for billing purposes, often called "claims" data, is what many measures within Medicare's reporting system are based on. But it's awfully inaccurate.
- CMS to Speak with ICD-10 Backers Tuesday
- Feds Stonewall ICD-10 Summit
- Managed Care Contract Negotiations Morph Under PPACA
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- Governor Details Healthcare Payment Reform Path in Arkansas
- Cyberattack Drill Exposes Healthcare's Vulnerabilities
- Boston Marathon Bombing Yields Lessons for Hospitals
- Physician Payment Data is Where the Action Is
- NY Abolishes Written Practice Agreement for NPs
- MetroHealth Revs Its Population Health Engine