OCR: Data Breaches Double Since July
Dom Nicastro, for HealthLeaders Media, December 2, 2010
The top five breaches with the largest number of affected individuals are:
- AvMed, Inc.
State: Florida
Approximate number of individuals affected: 1,220,000
Date of breach: Dec. 10, 2009
Type of breach: Theft
Location of beached information: Laptop - Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee
State: Tennessee
Approximate number of individuals affected: 1,023,209
Date of breach: Oct. 2, 2009
Type of breach: Theft
Location of breached information: Hard drives - South Shore Hospital (MA)
State: Massachusetts
Approximate number of individuals affected: 800,000
Date of breach: Feb. 26, 2010
Type of Breach: Loss
Location of Breached Information: Portable Electronic Device, Electronic Medical Record, Other - Puerto Rico Department of Health
State: Puerto Rico
Approximate number of individuals affected: 400,000
Date of breach: Sept. 21, 2010
Type of Breach: Unauthorized access/disclosure, hacking/IT incident
Location of Breached Information: Network Server - Affinity Health Plan, Inc.
State: New York
Approximate number of individuals affected: 344,579
Date of breach: Nov. 24, 2009
Type of breach: Other
Location of breached information: Other
Dom Nicastro is a contributing writer. He edits the Medical Records Briefings newsletter and manages the HIPAA Update Blog.
Most Viewed
Most Emailed
- $6.4B Henry Ford, Beaumont Merger Failed on Cultural Hurdles
- How Chargemaster Data May Affect Hospital Revenue
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- House Lawmakers Grill CMS Over Health Exchange Navigators
- Fortunately, Angelina Jolie Isn't On Medicare
- ED Physicians Key to Half of Hospital Admissions
- Don't Let Nurses Sink Your Bottom Line
- Insurer's App Aims to Lower Healthcare Costs, Securely
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Uncompensated Care Faces a Double Hit in Some States

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.
Shea Steinberg (12/6/2010 at 1:14 PM)
To me, this is not surprising considering the fact that technology now-a-days is so accessible, that one can literally walk away with people's information. I have found that storing health information in a <a href="http://www.practicefusion.com/pages/easy_to_use_EHR.html?utm_source=comment&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=PFLS ">cloud-based</a> format is more protected and secure. For example, Practice Fusion, a web-based <a href="http://www.practicefusion.com?utm_source=comment&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=PFLS">electronic health record</a> , has such high security that a single provider would not be able to afford such security alone and yet the product is completely free! Same with several email providers like Gmail or Ymail, offering a free and secure product in the cloud has become a safer alternative to storing information locally. -Shea Steinberg Jr. Social Media Specialist