Payers Pave Way to Provider EHRs
UnitedHealthcare, too, has unveiled a program that will provide outcomes-based financial incentives to physicians who have successfully adopted EHR systems that meet meaningful use criteria.
That's great news for hospitals and physicians struggling to make ends meet. But what are the downsides?
One school of though posits that taking money from payers for EHRs is a conflict of interest, since payers themselves have a keen interest in digging into patient data for the purpose of risk adjustment. i.e., analyzing it in order to forecast future wellness and calculate appropriate pricing.
Data is more likely to be analyzed in the aggregate, and in fact, HIPAA may protect individual patient records. What about questions of medical liability? Will insurer-subsidized EHRs make payers accountable for patient care or outcomes? Could payers be liable for medical decisions based on faulty software? It's doubtful.
The takeaway is that payers and providers both stand to gain from these EHR financing deals. The law has passed, and there's no escaping EHRs. Providers should direct their attention toward the many financing options emerging and start forming strategies now to put themselves into compliance by the deadline.
Cora Nucci is the Digital Associate Editorial Director for HealthLeaders Media.
- Medical Errors Third Leading Cause of Death, Senators Told
- Chronic Disease Care Costs Get Bipartisan Attention
- As States Regulate Provider Competition, Common Threads Emerge
- 4 Tectonic Shifts Shaking Up Healthcare
- Mayo Tops U.S. News Best Hospitals Rankings
- CareFirst Announces PCMH Program Results
- Hospitals Seeking to Understand PPACA Impact Turn to Data
- The case for concierge medicine
- Telemedicine Providers Welcome AMA Guidelines
- HSAs: What About the Fees?