OK Hospital vs. Garth Brooks: Guess Who Won?
Hospital executives—more than anyone—should be well aware of the dangers of presenting a jury with emotional testimony involving human suffering and loss. It is one reason why healthcare-related suits are so expensive, why these suits often destroy reputations, and why defense attorneys try mightily to avoid jury trials.
Brooks is rarely seen without his trademark broad-brimmed Stetson. However, juror Beverly Lacy saw ICVRH as the black hats. She told the World that she voted for the punitive damages because "we wanted to show them not to do that anymore to other people who couldn't take them to court if they needed to."
Lacy's comments suggest that Brooks's victory was also a win for the little guy, because ordinary people believe they have no chance against an institution. The jury identified with the multimillionaire, world-famous singer, and not with the 75-bed acute care hospital. Institutions have money, but country singers have mamas, and so do jurors.
At a press conference after the trial, Brooks called the panel "heroes." He said he was still looking for a way to honor Colleen.
"One day mom's name is going to go on the women's center right there where the hospital is. But that hospital won't be owned by Integris when it happens, I can tell you that. That's my dream."
- Antibiotic Overuse a 'Huge Threat' to Patient Safety, Says CDC
- 3 Traits Personality Assessments Can't Reveal
- Consumerism Drives Healthcare Branding, Rebranding Efforts
- PA Ranks See 'Phenomenal Growth,' Lack of Diversity
- CHS Hacked, 4.5M Patient Records Compromised
- CFO Exchange: Smartphones Poised to Disrupt Healthcare, Says Topol
- Business Roundup: M&A Activity Down Slightly in First Half of 2014
- CFO Exchange: Healthcare Leaders Share 5 Innovative Ideas
- Large Employers Trimming Healthcare Spending
- 3 Things the Ice Bucket Challenge Can Teach Hospital Marketers