Federal Proposals Would Limit Aggressive Hospital Collections Practices
The emergency medical care policy requires hospitals to provide care for emergency medical conditions as defined by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). The care must be provided regardless of a patient’s FAP eligibility.
In addition, the proposed regulation would limit the hospital charges to FAP eligibles to the "amount generally billed (AGB)" for a patient with health insurance coverage. The AGB could be calculated by a "look-back" method based on actual past claims paid to the hospital facility by either Medicare fee-for-service or a combination of Medicare FFS and private health insurance claims. AGB can also be calculated based on estimates of what Medicare would pay if the FAP-eligible patient was a Medicare FFS beneficiary.
Comments and requests for a public hearing on the Treasury regulations must be received by September 24. The American Hospital Association is expected tp oppose the proposal. In an e-mail exchange with HealthLeaders Media, an AHA spokesperson described the proposed rules as "overly prescriptive" and stated that they "could discourage hospitals’ innovations and best practices."
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Ebola: Health Officials Try to Quell Front Line Fears
- Reducing Readmissions Starts with Better Collaboration
- Ebola: A New Normal in Dallas
- Partners HealthCare M&A Deal Under Scrutiny
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Educated Nurses Save Money
- 'Overtreatment' Debate Circles Back to Lung Cancer Screening
- As virus spreads, insurers exclude Ebola from new policies
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform