Can a True-Cost Model Save Your Hospital?
I spoke with Selivanoff while researching a story about PBC in this month's HealthLeaders magazine. Selivanoff has written extensively on the topic and helped implement it at Catholic Health Initiatives hospitals prior to joining St. Helena. He is putting this cost system in place across the three campuses of his organization.
Selivanoff defines PBC as a type of cost accounting that offers CFOs a tool to better understand the resources consumed by tracking all resources used in providing the organization's products and services. It tracks direct costs and allocates indirect costs of processes and services.
Overhead is spread across all billable services without regard to the relationship of the overhead within a specific procedure. Process costing is used to ascertain the cost of a product at each stage of the process.
I can already hear CFOs objecting: "This is full cost accounting; is she nuts? That's hugely time-consuming."
Indeed, PBC and similar variations of this model do require every resource in a service to be manually tallied and updated annually, including the quantity of labor, frequency, supplies used, and unit cost. So, yes, it's a large undertaking. But it is worthwhile.
Keep in mind that healthcare reform will have a big impact on your hospital costing systems regardless of whether you change or not (though not doing so could prove detrimental over time).
- Senators Hear How Two-Midnight Rule Harms Patients, Hospitals
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- IOM Identifies GME Problems, Calls for Finance Changes
- Healthcare Costs Start With What We Eat
- Revenue Cycles Get a Boost from Simple JPEG Files
- Handshaking Spreads Germs. Get Over It.
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Anatomy of 3 Health System Rebranding Efforts