10 Polemics from the Supreme Court Decision
4. "Crabbed reading"
In Ginsburg's dissent of Roberts' refusal to accept the power of the individual mandate under the Commerce Clause, Ginsburg implied that her fellow Justice is ill-tempered and surly. "The Chief Justice's crabbed reading of the Commerce Clause harkens back to the era in which the Court routinely thwarted Congress' efforts to regulate the national economy in the interest of those who labor to sustain it."
She also wrote that Roberts "rigid reading of the Clause makes scant sense and is stunningly retrogressive."
5. "Free ride"
Ginsburg argued in her dissent that the uninsured do indeed use healthcare, which has an inarguable impact on the insured, with costs of more than $100 billion in healthcare services—nearly 5% of the national total in 2009—passed on to other payers. "As economists would describe what happens, the uninsured 'free ride' on those who pay for health insurance."
She added, "By requiring the healthy uninsured to obtain insurance or pay a penalty structured as a tax, the minimum coverage provision ends the free ride these individuals currently enjoy."
- Reform Puts Vise Grips on Physicians
- Medicare Opt-Out a Viable Physician Strategy
- Look Beyond Nurse-Patient Ratios
- Boston Marathon Bombing Yields Lessons for Hospitals
- How Physicians Can Help Ease Mental Health Provider Shortages
- NPP Demand Rising Under Value-Based Care Models
- Providers Lag as Consumers Set Agenda
- Physicians as Economic Powerhouses and Tech Laggards
- Hospital Groups Back NQF Report on Patient Sociodemographics
- The Flourishing Medical Tourism Business in America