Trustmark's Premium Hikes 'Excessive,' Says HHS
Cohen said that HHS has made determinations of unreasonable rate increases on six occasions under its new powers, including these five. The sixth was a November review of Everence Insurance's 12% increase for a plan held by nearly 5,000 subscribers in Pennsylvania.
Three other HHS-ordered actuarial rate reviews, in Montana, Louisiana, and Missouri, resulted in conclusions that the increases were reasonable.
Cohen emphasized that because of its new federal authority to review rate increases in excess of 10%, and because of $250 million in grants to states to set up their own authority to do their own audits, "the number of states with the authority to approve or disapprove rate increases before they take effect has increased from 30 to 37, with several states extending this authority to new markets" since March of 2010.
"It won't surprise you to know that state insurance departments, state governments, would rather review rates in their state than have us do it. Let's be clear," he said.
- Primary Care Docs Average More Hospital Revenue Than Specialists
- 69% of Employers Plan to Offer Healthcare Coverage After 2014
- Building a Better Healthcare Board
- Q&A: Catholic Health Initiatives' New Senior VP for Capital Finance
- CMS Seeks to 'Rapidly Reduce' Medicare Spending with $1B in Grants
- Quiet ORs Better for Patient Safety
- CMS Releases Hospital Pricing Data
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Hospital Pricing Data Dump Won't Hurt You, Yet
- Telemedicine is Retail Health Clinics' Newest Tool