Eliminating Individual Mandate Would Come With Strings
4. Low interest in HIX, low enrollment, and less subsidized coverage available. Private coverage and Medicaid lose 12.3 million and 3.5 million members, respectively. The number of uninsured grows to 42.2 million and the cost of uncompensated care increases to $61 billion. Without the individual mandate, government spends $26 billion less on healthcare. Employers and individuals see their spending drop by $26 billion and $30 billion, respectively.
If you're opposed to healthcare reform, these are some compelling numbers that appear to make the case to jettison the individual mandate. But here's the deal: it's complicated.
A case in point is the Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital payment. A reduction in the DSH payments in the ACA is based on a 45% reduction in the number of uninsured. According to the report, without the mandate, that condition might not be met "in which case there would be no Medicaid DSH savings to the federal government."
Sure my eyes glaze over when I look at all the tables and numbers in the nine-page report, but this is some of the crucial analysis that state governments and Congress need to consider—oops—make that should have considered.
The fate of the individual mandate now sits with nine Supreme Court justices.
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Why Is Healthcare Price Transparency So Hard?
- EHR Spending Continues, But Jury Still Out on ROI
- Adverse Events from Insulin Prescribing 'An Epidemic'
- 5 Hot Healthcare Ideas from SXSW
- Care Coordination a Cost-Cutting Quality Driver
- Hospital Groups Strike Back at Hospital Rating Systems
- Payers Detail Strategies That Drive Consumer Satisfaction
- Use of Locum Tenens Up 22% in One Year
- Hospital CEO Turnover Hits Record High
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay