OPPS Proposed Rule Significantly Affects Coding
"I think this makes more sense in the clinic than it does in the ED," Hoy says. Shah is concerned that the proposal may be just as problematic for clinic visits because paying a single rate for all different clinic types ignores the different costs and services being rendered.
"There is a risk that certain providers may be systematically overpaid, while others may be underpaid depending on the types of clinics they have, the volume of patients, and the manner in which they deliver care," Shah says. "If the rate is inappropriately low, providers may be forced to reduce certain services or "rush" through others, such as education and teaching, care coordination, etc. CMS' payment policy shouldn't systematically penalize providers or patients, and must be reviewed carefully in the coming months."
CMS is also looking closely at provider-based clinics, which could be one reason for the E/M change, Hoy says. CMS will be collecting information about off-campus provider-based clinics.
CMS is looking for comments about the proposed E/M changes, so providers should review this proposal and submit their comments to CMS, Shah says.
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big