Closer Payer/Provider Relationships Inevitable, but Evolutionary
Caron says there is intense interest across the country in finding new ways for payers and providers to work together in a manner that fits their unique market circumstances.
"Both sides are coming together to leverage the other's competency," he said. "There's an openness to pilot and work together to try new things… It's not going to be a cookie-cutter approach."
Barbara Ladon, managing director at Denver-based Newpoint Healthcare Advisors, told me last week that size is an important consideration for providers seeking closer relationships with payers. Large health systems have more options because their larger scale allows them to take on increased risk and play a health plan role. "The smaller hospitals—150 to 200 beds—are looking for collaborative relationships," she told me.
Drawing payers and providers closer together should help to create a value-based healthcare delivery system. "It's all based on improving the health of the population," Ladon said. "Providers are incented to take on the responsibility for managing the care of the population."
In terms of increasing value, there also is a powerful logical reason to pursue closer payer/provider relationships: partners work together better than adversaries.
Christopher Cheney is health plans editor at HealthLeaders Media.
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- Anthem Blue Cross, 7 CA Health Systems Create New Challenger, Business Model
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform
- How to Build a Health Plan from Scratch
- 3 Strategies for Retaining Millennial Employees
- Advocate, NorthShore Deal Would Create 16-Hospital System