4 Reasons to Ban Social Media in Your Hospital
Like UMMC, Baylor Health began to block social media in 2005 during the rise of MySpace. Leadership was fearful of the powerful draw of social media and its implications on productivity and patient privacy, says Howland.
"We're living in an age of transparency, and blocking social media is a sign of distrust that doesn't sit well," says Ashley Howland, social media manager at Baylor Health.
Howland recently participated in a HealthLeaders Media webcast about building an appropriate and measurable social media strategy, where she discusses employees being ambassadors of a brand's message. "[Unblocking social media] is a statement for employees that you trust them to use these tools responsibly."
2. You don't care about patient experience
"The fastest, simplest way to stay close to everything you care about," –Twitter
By blocking social media, healthcare organizations also ban patients from everything they care about. That's not a positive message for an industry that is increasingly more focused on patient experience, and it could send patients to a nearby competitor.
"Our guest Wi-Fi access went through our same network, so visitors and patients were facing the same blocking as employees were," says Bennett. "That was a big patient dissatisfier when we did surveys, and it was also a big motivator to make the switch. Our patients demanded it, and at these vulnerable moments in their lives, they needed it to connect with their support system."
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Resisting the Healthcare Consolidation Frenzy
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- Give Nurses in Wheelchairs a Chance
- HL20: George Halvorson—Expectations for Success
- 3 Better Ways to Market Bariatric Surgery
- Top 3 Health Plan Game Changers of 2013