Commentary: A Modest Proposal for Controlling Healthcare Costs
The most controversial part of the bid proposal is how much money "X" dollars would represent. Fiscal conservatives might want to use a comparatively low number such as the amount designated in the federal government Health and Human Services 2004 budget. Others may be concerned that the level of care would be diminished by too low of a number and may want to freeze the 2010 budget number for five years.
The budget number chosen will necessarily be the result of negotiation, meaning a middle ground number, which is a good thing. What is important is the fact that this model will work regardless of the budget amount that is used. Likewise, this model will work in the existing environment, but will also work if the country continues down the healthcare reform path articulated in the Affordable Care Act.
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- Hospital M&A Volume Up, Value Down in 3Q
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- Small Doesn't Mean Doomed