Revascularization of AMI Patients Persists Despite No Demonstrated Benefit
They found no significant change in the rates of PCI.
The authors speculate that some of the "clinical inertia" may be due to "lack of agreement regarding interpretation of data, especially when it contradicts long-held beliefs and external influences, such as conflicting patient expectations and financial incentives to perform the unindicated procedure, and fear of litigation."
She added that in courtrooms, a bad outcome may still result in a jury verdict against a physician, even though he followed the guidelines. In New York State for example, she said, judges vary widely on whether they will admit the guidelines in testimony.
"A lot of judges won't allow it because they say the guidelines can't be cross-examined," she said.
In an invited commentary, Mauro Moscucci of the Cardiovascular Division of the University of Miami, FL, said the paper "further focuses our attention on procedures that certainly increase healthcare expenditures without clear benefit."
- Sharp HealthCare Leaves Pioneer ACO Program
- Acute Kidney Injury Gets New Focus
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Interventional Radiology No Longer a Sub-Specialty
- NFP Hospitals' Revenue Growth at 'All-Time Low'
- Half of All Primary Care, Internal Medicine Jobs Unfilled in 2013
- PCI: Concerns Mount About Appropriateness
- Transforming Cancer Care
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions