Care Coordination Advancing Slowly
When asked about interventions most likely to reduce the costs of healthcare, survey respondents identify these: adopt a care coordination plan, 69%; improve process efficiencies, 57%; automate systems and processes, 46%; and increase patient engagement, 44%.
When asked what initiatives their organization would adopt to control costs and improve care, 50% of the respondents say they would develop or join a patient-centered medical home; 48% say they would join an integrated delivery system. Manas says there are many variables involved in establishing a medical home, with success increasingly depending on patient responsibility.
Of those who have not embarked on a collaborative care program, 41% indicate they do not have interested partners to collaborate with, and 26% and 21%, respectively, acknowledge that their organization had no financial or strategic interest to do so. Mahan says the lack of interest might be attributed to healthcare systems "that could not find an interested partner, possibly because of demographics, or hesitancy within the culture of its relationship with physicians."
Chicoine explains that various organizations are dealing with coordinated care in different ways, depending on their needs and expectations, as a result of healthcare reform. "Some organizations are focused. They believe in coordinated care and population management," he says. In that way, it's "full steam ahead."
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Providers Prep for New Payment Models as Population Health Grows
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- 3 Ways to Rev Employee Development Programs
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- Transforming Decision Support and Reporting
- Aligning Executive Compensation with Provider Mission
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health