Nursing
e-Newsletter
Intelligence Unit Special Reports Special Events Subscribe Sponsored Departments Follow Us

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn RSS

Imaging Rates Scrutinized; Conclusions Mixed

Cheryl Clark, for HealthLeaders Media, August 6, 2012

They also suggest that the increase is due to the lack of evidence-based guidance on when the studies help prolong life or make determinations further treatment or hospice.  To date, routine use of imaging is recommended only in stage IV patients with colorectal cancer that has spread to the liver or lung to determine suitability for resection.

"Such discretionary decision-making, ie, the 'gray' area where recommendations are equivocal or nonexistent, is known to drive higher healthcare spending," the researchers wrote.

Additionally, the researchers discovered tremendous variability throughout the country, with patients in the top 10% receiving at least one scan per month during continuing care, and at least three in their last month of life.

"Imaging, although it often leads to (appropriate) palliative measures, may also distract patients from focusing on achievable end-of-life goals, require them to spend more of their limited time in medical care settings, and/or provoke anxiety."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Comments are moderated. Please be patient.

1 comments on "Imaging Rates Scrutinized; Conclusions Mixed"


Ryan Grote (8/6/2012 at 11:00 PM)
These findings are congruent with work that Memorial Hermann has been developing in Houston to standardize order sets to help support the clinical team focus on what they do best- develop a plan of care for patients- while using the guidelines of limited resources, in this instance, money. I am hopeful to see more evidence that drives to stronger clinical paths and better outcomes for patients, and the rest of us