Medication Lapses Put Discharged Patients at Risk
"New contraindications may have arisen that were not captured in the investigators' administrative database. Physicians may have used the admission as an opportunity to rethink the original medication indication," they wrote.
And, they said, the patients may have decided that the side effects of certain medications outweighed any benefit, in light of a new condition with which they had to grapple.
But Kahn and Angus said Bell and colleagues did everything they could to minimize this effect, using only medications with solid evidence and strong benefit-to-risk profiles "that are unlikely to be stopped without good clinical reason."
Another possibility, Kahn and Angus suggested, is the finding in the study that patients were prescribed "a median of 12 different medications in the year prior to the hospitalizations, and 75% were prescribed nine or more medications."
"As a consequence, hospital-based physicians increasingly not only must attend to the patient's acute medical problems, but also have to manage an ever-expanding array of complex and unfamiliar medications [which carry...] unknown adverse effects and put patients at risk for unexpected interactions between medications.
"Thus, for some patients, hospital care is now as much about organizing and reorganizing a litany of medications as it is managing acute disease...It is not so surprising that important medications become lost in the mix."
Cheryl Clark is senior quality editor and California correspondent for HealthLeaders Media. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists.
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- AHRQ: Surgical Admissions Bring 48% of Hospital Revenue
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- HIMSS: Software Bugs, Shifting Alliances Unsettling for CIOs
- Hospitals Adapting Amid Continued Drug Shortages
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion
- Steep Drop Seen in Medically Unnecessary C-Sections
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers
- As Allegations Swirl, Baylor Plano Rejects Baldrige Award