Physicians' Ties to IMD Manufacturers Can Ratchet Up Costs
According to the report, one hospital paid 83% more than another for the exact same knee implant.
Orthopedic and cardiac procedures accounted for nearly all IMD-related Medicare expenditures from 2004 through 2009. That is only expected to continue to grow. A recent HealthLeaders Media Industry 2012 survey (PDF )shows that 23% of physician leaders say that has a revenue growth potential of 6% or more over the next 3 to 5 years for orthopedic programs; with 16% saying heart programs will have similar growth. Some 46% say they anticipate growth in both service lines at least 1% to 5%.
There is a way to begin fighting the explosion of costs: If the physician-hospital relationship is strong, hospitals can consider evaluating purchases from many IMD suppliers, and using this competitive information to gain leverage for lower prices, the GAO suggests.
One of the systems that has been successful in reducing implant costs, for instance, has been the University of California San Francisco Medical Center, which established a protocol involving physicians and administrators in purchasing arrangements, says Eula Mckinney, MsHA, director of the general surgery, orthopedics, pain management and spine service lines for USMC.
UCSMC began tackling the problem of expenses a few years ago after it projected millions of dollars of losses in spinal implant costs. In response, the medical center established a committee implant purchasing structure involving administrators and physicians that enabled them to work "in harmony," Mckinney says.
- Two-Midnight Rule Must be Fixed or Replaced, Say Providers
- Don't Underestimate Emotional Intelligence
- The Secret to Physician Engagement? It's Not Better Pay
- Care Coordination Tough to Define, Measure
- Yale New Haven Health Partners with Tenet Healthcare in CT
- Physicians Take SGR Repeal Message to Washington
- Size Matters in Antibiotic Overuse
- CDC Warns of Antibiotic Overuse in Hospitals
- 4 Reasons PCMH Principles Aren't Going Away
- SCOTUS Review of NC Board Case 'A Very Big Deal' to Providers