Medical Apology Strategy Shows Signs of Strength
The University of Michigan Health System's "apology" program has been seen as a benchmark among those seeking to establish similar programs. The health system adopted a policy of investigating adverse events in 2002, which included the apology strategy. Using the technique over the past decade, the health system has been "incredibly successful by all the metrics," Woodward says. It has reduced the length of cases, and the administrative costs of each case by more than 60%, he adds. "There has been tremendous satisfaction on the part of physicians and even attorneys," according to Woodward.
Although there have been many organizations that have initiated the apology strategy, many physicians, obviously, don't use it. "Patients never get an apology," Woodward says. "It is something they look for. When something goes wrong, there's almost a termination of open communication between physician and patient."
A Massachusetts Medical Society study showed that there is strong support for the DA&O approach because, among other things, it is the "right thing to do" ethically, according to Woodward.
The Massachusetts hospitals, physicians, patient groups, and insurers who are carrying out the pilot want to take the University of Michigan Health System work even further by applying it to the entire state.
- As Retail Clinics Surge, Quality Metrics MIA
- Providers' Push to Consolidate Roils Payers
- Former NQF Co-Chair Linked to Conflicts of Interest in Journal Probe
- 6 Not-So-Good Reasons for Avoiding Population Health
- Medicare Cost, Quality Data Tools Weak, Says GAO
- No Employee Satisfaction, No Patient-Centered Culture
- CMS Mulls Income-Adjusting MA Stars
- Population Health Pays Off for NY Collaborative
- RN Named Chief Patient Experience Officer
- Evidence-Based Practice and Nursing Research: Avoiding Confusion