Peer Messengers Help Docs Get Back On Track
A four-year study which ended in 2005 evaluated 375 physicians deemed to be at "high-risk" for possible litigation. After peer messenger involvement, 64% of the targeted physicians had shown improvements in their work, Pichert and his colleagues report in The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. About 19% of the physicians did not change their behavior, and 7% actually worsened, the report states.
In what Pichert called outright successes, 34% of physicians who met with the peer messengers for two years improved their "risk scores." The peer messenger's first visits averaged barely over a half hour, and follow up visits took less.
Overall, peer review is becoming an increasingly important element in determining physicians' conduct and helping them on the straight and narrow, whether it involves clinical quality or bedside manner.
Although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provides guidance for managing complaints and grievances about physicians, "the value of such reports lie in what the organization decides to do with information thus learned," Pichert says. And that's where the peer messenger review process helps fill the gap, he adds.
- As Medicare Advantage Cuts Loom, Disagreement Over Program's Stability
- Medicare Advantage Carriers See 'No Choice' But to Accept Cuts
- Centralizing the Revenue Cycle Protects the Bottom Line
- CA Fines 8 Hospitals for Medical Errors
- Physicians to Appeal 'Docs v. Glocks' Ruling in FL
- Doctors Feel Pressure to Accept Risk-based Reimbursement
- Surgical Checklists Unused in 10% of Hospitals, CMS Data Shows
- Employers Weigh Risks, Benefits of Private Exchanges
- A Fresh Look at End-of-Life Care
- 3 Management Lessons from a Supermarket Debacle