Increased MICU Staffing Saves Lives
"While we did assess hospital variable costs, we do caution readers that these are simple, crude measures and are not the same as cost effectiveness," Netzer explained in an interview. "Determining the return on resource allocation in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Years or comparative effectiveness are substantial endeavors and are outside of the scope of our study. We would like to pursue those analyses moving forward."
Simply spending money won't achieve MICU's results, researchers caution: "It is unlikely that untargeted expenditures of additional resources in an ICU would result in patient improvements."
Moreover, many hospitals will be unable to replicate MICU's success, especially given the additional cost. "It's neither feasible nor likely that every ICU in the U.S. would reorganize according to ACCCM Level I recommendations and see dramatic improvements." Netzer says. "However, organization to optimal Level I guidelines … should be seriously considered by urban, tertiary care medical centers. This is especially true of the main hospital within a medical system."
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- Telehealth Improves Patient Care in ICUs
- CMS Sets 2014 Pay Rates for Hospital Outpatient and Physician Services
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- LifePoint Bolsters Presence in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
- States Rejecting Medicaid Expansion Forgo Billions in Federal Funds
- Douglas Hawthorne—A Chance to Do Something Big