BSCA Revenue Cap Draws Mixed Reactions
Jones supported AB 52, a California bill, which would give his office the power to review and reject insurance rate hikes. The bill passed through the legislature this week and awaits the governor's signature.
In an editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle, Jamie Court, the president of Consumer Watchdog, called the 2% announcement a "last-ditch attempt to discourage legislators" from passing AB 52. "For a not-for-profit health insurance company like Blue Shield, which has more than $3.6 billion in reserves, that's 2% too much."
The company's reserve of $3.6 billion is a sticking point. The DOI's Jones said the $3.6 billion is considerably in excess of what is required to meet state financial solvency requirements. In media interviews he has said the amount begins the question. "If Blue Shield has this much in its reserves, then why is it not giving more money back to its policyholders?"
Consumers Union reported in 2010 that over the past decade, nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield health insurers across the country stockpiled billions of dollars in surplus--while raising premiums for consumers by as high as 20% annually.
The CU report may be downloaded here.
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- 'Kafkaesque' Value System Unfairly Penalizes Doctor Pay
- Proton Beam Therapy Poised for Growth in US
- mHealth Tackles Readmissions
- CNO Leads $1M Charge for New Scrubs, Uniforms
- Some Cancer Hospitals' Quality Data Will Soon Be Public
- 4 Crucial Tactics for Reining in Healthcare Cost
- Targeting Self-Insured Populations
- MA an Insurance Proving Ground for Providers
- How Digital Strategy Shapes Patient Engagement at Boston Children's Hospital
- How, and Why, to Recruit Male Nurses