Meaningful Use or Useful Life? Can Both Exist?
Dr. Kramer describes one of the most wasteful reasons why EHRs and EMRs have such a limited life cycle. Other explanations include compatibility changes from mergers and acquisition, regulatory and data burdens which make systems obsolete, and, of course, performance issues when current systems don't perform or are not accepted as had been hoped.
One reason I never hear for replacing electronic health record systems, though, is from Moore's Law, the axiom named for Intel founder Gordon Moore which posits that computer speed and memory double every 18 months to make the former iterations of everything from core processors to digital cameras obsolete.
IT is and always will be a fluid and ongoing investment. Using a reliable system of interoperable electronic medical records is the single make-or-break operational evolution that has to happen in this decade for healthcare to have even the chance to reduce costs and improve care. There is a difference, however, between a sustained investment in a long-term "utility" and throwing capital at vaporous, "disposable" systems.
Jim Molpus is Leadership Programs Director of HealthLeaders Media.
- EHR Systems 'Immature, Costly,' AMA Says
- Better HCAHPS Scores Protect Revenue
- Anthem Blue Cross, 7 CA Health Systems Create New Challenger, Business Model
- Interstate Medical Licensure Effort Advances
- Narrow Networks Cut Costs, Not Quality, Economists Say
- CEO Exchange: Preparing for Population Health
- Data Points to Boom in Private HIX
- How to Build a Health Plan from Scratch
- 'Early Offer' Malpractice Programs May Spur Reform
- Insurers see cost hikes in Partners HealthCare (MA) mergers