Healthcare.gov Security Concerns Won't Go Away
McMillan is also chief executive officer of Cynergistek, a security audit and risk assessment firm in Austin, TX. He contends that the American public would be safer with healthcare.gov being taken down for however long is necessary to ensure that not just the hub, but the spokes—the state-associated exchanges plus the databases of the seven participating federal agencies undergo a thorough security assessment.
"There's just a tremendous amount of information about you as an individual in databases that quite frankly, in terms of access, is unprecedented, with this health insurance exchange," McMillan told me in November.
McMillan argues that insider abuse is a huge risk, and he's concerned that operatives in any of these agencies could use the rapidly accumulating information to commit identity theft. But the political cost of taking the site down is one of the big reasons that, HHS refuses to unplug it for an extended period of time.
Where McMillan and I fundamentally disagree is in his contention that the well-documented cases of consumers being unable to log on to healthcare.gov are grounds for an immediate takedown of the site.
- How Top-Ranked MA Plans Earn Their Stars
- Readmissions: No Quick Fix to Costly Hospital Challenge
- How Hospitals Can Become 'Upstreamists'
- 4 Ways to Lower the Cost to Collect from Self-Pay Patients
- House Calls Key to Pioneer ACO Success
- How Telehealth Pays Off for Providers, Patients
- 4 Tips for Managing Employed Physicians
- Defensive Medicine Still Prevalent Despite Tort Reform
- WellPoint Dominates Nearly Half of Markets, AMA Says
- 'Overtreatment' Debate Circles Back to Lung Cancer Screening