NAIC Summary of Health Plan Coverage Ready for Testing
The industry has raised a red flag about the coverage facts labels, which illustrate sample coverage for threes medical scenarios, including treating breast cancer. In a letter to the subcommittee on insurer recommended that the less complex medical conditions should be used in the examples. That’s a good point and certainly reminds everyone of the danger of oversimplification.
“It is a complicated balancing act,” says Susan Pisano, a spokesperson for AHIP. She points to studies that show that consumers are happy with summaries as long as additional information is available elsewhere, like on a web site.
With healthcare reform expected to being millions of new insurance shoppers into the market, the time is definitely right for a summary of benefits and coverage that can be easily presented and understood. But the coverage facts label may need to be tweaked to make sure that in the push to make health benefits understandable, we don’t trip and make the information meaningless.
Margaret Dick Tocknell is a reporter/editor with HealthLeaders Media.
- Resisting the Healthcare Consolidation Frenzy
- MGMA Urges 'End-to-End' ICD-10 Testing
- 1 in 5 CT Screenings for Lung Cancer Results in Overdiagnosis
- New G-Codes to Pay Doctors for Broad Array of Non-Face-to-Face Care
- Scary Financial Challenges for 2014
- Give Nurses in Wheelchairs a Chance
- MU Compliance Announcement Sparks Concern, Confusion
- 3 Better Ways to Market Bariatric Surgery
- HL20: George Halvorson—Expectations for Success
- Top 3 Health Plan Game Changers of 2013